SOT

SOT Navigator

Deterministic codebase risk artifacts

For inherited systems and modernization decisions

Decision-ready architecture and repo-risk reviews, with evidence attached.

SOT Navigator helps CTOs, founders, and software consultancies understand where risk concentrates before roadmap, migration, rescue, or diligence decisions. Every claim is evidence-linked. Unknowns are explicit.

Request scope View case studies AI builder snapshot Proof bundle Trust and method Ask a question

Deterministic: same input, byte-identical output.

Traceable: claim -> file path + hash + line.

Honest: unknowns are surfaced, not hidden.

Fixed-scope offers

Premium outcomes without consulting sprawl.

Engagements are fixed-scope and decision-focused to keep delivery fast and quality high.

Architecture Decision Review

4 business day target

  • 1 system or repo estate
  • Decision memo + next-step sequencing
  • One readout for owner alignment

Risk Baseline

72h delivery target

  • 1 repository
  • Executive one-pager + evidence pack
  • Unknowns and confidence disclosure

Diligence Sprint

Board and investor ready

  • 1-2 repositories
  • CTO, Security, and CFO briefs
  • 60-minute readout call

Proof

Artifacts stand on their own.

Outputs are designed to be reviewed by leadership and verified by technical teams.

Public proof demonstrates capability and trust boundaries. Full target-specific control and evidence packs are scoped and NDA-first.

Request sample artifact pack See artifact guide
Executive risk snapshot
Unknowns excerpt

Unknowns are explicit first-class outputs.

Blast radius map visual example

Blast radius and dependency propagation hotspots.

Engagement fit

Who this is for and not for.

Best fit

  • Inherited system, modernization, or rescue decision is live.
  • Need for evidence-backed prioritization, not generic consulting.
  • Clear owner, timeline, and budget.

Outside standard scope

  • Open-ended custom consulting or staff augmentation.
  • Code-style linting or SAST replacement requests.
  • "Just exploring" without business trigger.

Use-case paths

Pick the path that matches your trigger.

M&A Diligence

For acquisition and investment decisions with short decision windows.

Open diligence path

Compliance Readiness

For audit-prep cycles requiring deterministic technical evidence mapping.

Open compliance path

CTO Baseline

For leadership-level risk baselining and board-ready engineering posture updates.

Open CTO path

Inherited Systems

For inherited repo estates, modernization pressure, and hard sequencing decisions before delivery expands.

Open modernization path

Execution model

Choose the delivery model that matches your constraints.

Every model produces the same deterministic, evidence-linked outputs. The difference is where execution happens and how much operational lift your team carries.

Concierge Run

Recommended
  • Fastest path: we run, package, and brief your team.
  • Lowest internal lift for engineering and security teams.
  • Best fit for diligence, board, and audit deadlines.
Select concierge run

Customer-Run Offline

Air-gapped / regulated

  • Signed offline runner for your controlled environment.
  • Commit-bound access key with scoped permissions controls.
  • Maximum repository custody for strict governance models.
Select offline run

Joint Guided Run

Collaborative execution

  • Your team executes locally with our guided setup session.
  • Shared validation during run and artifact review.
  • Balanced control and speed for mixed ownership teams.
Select joint run

Execution model pricing ladder

Base scope is set by engagement type; execution model determines delivery premium.

Execution model Commercial tier Premium vs base scope Best when
Concierge Run Standard Included You need the fastest path to a decision-ready readout.
Joint Guided Run Premium +20% enablement premium You want local execution with guided validation.
Customer-Run Offline Enterprise +45% security packaging premium You require strict repository custody or air-gapped execution.

Optional accelerators: rush SLA (<=10 business days) +25%; board/audit live readout add-on; multi-repo orchestration priced per additional repository.

Process

Simple engagement flow.

  1. 1. Scope: fixed scope and timeline agreed.
  2. 2. Run: deterministic scan and artifact generation.
  3. 3. Deliver: package with evidence and integrity outputs.
  4. 4. Decide: readout and next-step decision.

Decision speed

Manual diligence vs artifact-led decision flow.

Decision activity Typical manual effort SOT Navigator output
Risk zone identification Days of code review Produced from structural graph
Claim traceability Spreadsheet evidence mapping Path + hash + line anchored
Confidence disclosure Implicit or missing Unknowns and coverage explicit
Readout readiness Multiple iterations Executive + analyst-ready artifacts

Scope request

Request your fixed-scope proposal.

Share the key details and get a fast fit assessment with a fixed-scope proposal path.

Fit signal

Complete the required fields to see your fit signal before sending.

All options produce deterministic artifacts; delivery speed and operational ownership differ.

Ask a direct question

Public validation runs

Reproducibility demonstrated on public codebases.

See all validation cases

Need a decision-ready baseline?

Share scope details and timeline. If fit is confirmed, you get a fixed-scope proposal.

Request scope Ask a question